Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Personality and the Five Factor Theory Essay - 2808 Words

PSYC Essay To understand personality there are three main aspects that must be looked at: LArsen and Buss Definition of personality, The Six Domains of knowledge of personality, and Costa and McCraes Five Factor Theory. In this essay I will first break down larsen and Buss definition and connect it to the domains, then connect the domains to the five factor thoery (FFT). Larsen and Buss define personality as the set of psychological traits and mechanisms within the individual that are organized and relitivly enduring and that influence his or her interactions with, and adaptations to, the environment (including the intrapsychic, physical and social environment). To fully understand this defintion, it is best to break it down into†¦show more content†¦His research show that when hostile people bump into others they treat ambiguous behavior as hostile. When they act aggressive, it evokes agression in the other person, making the aggression a self-fufiling prophecy. So if a per son from the outside environment acts hostile towards us, it evokes that same hostility from us. The third main interaction people have with the environment is manipulation of the environment and those within it. Manipulation does not have to have a negative connatation with it, but usually does. Types of manipulation include: coersion, charm, regression and reason. Different personality types are more likley to use differnt kinds of manipulation, such as people low on agreeableness are more likely to use coersion by yelling, while people high on agreeableness will use reason to get people to do what they want. The final part of the definition is the adaptations (to the environment) like dealing with the challenges and problems we face throughout life. One way to examine this is through the cognitive experintial domian and the concept of goals and personal projects. Personal projects are a set of relevent actions intended to achieve a goal that a person has selected as efined by pst chologist Brian Little. He beleives these are important to understanding personality because they reflect how people navigate through everyday life. As we go through life,Show MoreRelatedCosta And Mccrae s Five Factor Theory Of Personality And Eysenck s Pen Theory1496 Words   |  6 PagesCosta and McCrae’s Five Factor theory of personality and Eysenck’s PEN theory have been the subject of significant research in an effort to better understand human personality. This paper focuses on two opposing theories: Costa and McCrae’s Five Factor model, a lexically-based theory with five factors, and Eysenck’s PEN model, a biologically-based theory with three core traits of personality. Utilizing factor analysis, Raymond Cattell (1946) recognized 16 personality factors (16pf). Cattell believedRead MoreTheories Of Personality : Psychodynamic, Trait Or Five Factor Model, Humanistic, And Social Cognitive974 Words   |  4 Pagesfour major theories of personality: psychodynamic, trait or five-factor model, humanistic, and social-cognitive. The psychodynamic theory primarily focuses on the role of the unconscious mind. The social cognitive theory focuses on the effect of the environment on behavior and is based on theories of learning. Whereas, the humanistic theory emphasizes conscious life experiences and choices. The trait or five-factor model focuses on characteristics themselves and not the roots of personality. To beginRead MoreThe Big Five Personality Traits And Factor Theories From Eysenck, Mccrae, And Costa s773 Words   |  4 Pages Describe the â€Å"Big Five† personality traits. Trait and Factor Theories from Eysenck, McCrae, and Costa’s: Like Eysenck, McCrae and Costa’s thought that personality â€Å"traits are bipolar and follow a bell-shaped distribution.† Those who take the Big Five personality trait test tend to score in the middle (neither high or low) of the bell curve of each trait, and that only a few people score close to the five basic dimensions, a high, or low to the extremes. (Feist Feist, 2008, p.422) http://www.simplypsychologyRead MoreComparing Eysenck s Theory Of Personality And Costa And Mcrae s Five Factor Model1511 Words   |  7 Pages(1959) defines personality traits as being ‘any distinguishable, relatively enduring way in which one individual varies from another’. Subsequently, trait theory can be identified as an approach to the study of human personality. The aim of psychologists, specifically trait theorists, is to explain similarities and differences between individuals based on traits. Although numerous psychologists differ on the amount of traits that are significant, each theorist categorizes personality traits along severalRead MoreDispositional, Evolutionary And Evolutionary Theory1283 Words   |  6 Pagesand Evolutionary Theory Nicholas DeRico PSY/405 August 24, 2015 Dispositional, Biological and Evolutionary Theory Abstract There are many theories that attempt to clarify the structures that influence personality, for example dispositional, and Evolutionary theory. This paper will discuss the differences that are among dispositional and evolutionary personality theories, as well as, strengths and limitations of dispositional and evolutionary and biological personality theories their bearing onRead MoreAn Analysis of Personality Theory1332 Words   |  5 PagesAn Analysis of Personality Theory by for Everyone has a personality, of course, but until fairly recently, there were no personality theories available to help understand what factors contribute to its development. In recent years, though, personality theories such as McCrae and Costas Big Five and Schwartzs theory of basic values have been advanced for these purposes. To gain some deeper insights into these issues, this paper presents a review of the relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly literatureRead MoreWhat Drives Adult Personality Development?1542 Words   |  7 PagesReitz and Zimmerman’s article (2014) What Drives Adult Personality Development? A Comparison of Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence In terms of adult personality development, the most prominent perspectives utilize genetic and environmental factors into their models. Some examples of these theories consist of the five factor theory of personality and neo-social analytic theory (Specht et al., 2014). McCray and Costa’s five factor theory focuses on biological maturation and not life experiencesRead MoreThe Five Factor Model Of Personality853 Words   |  4 PagesAn analysis of the five factor model of personality Many contemporary psychologists believe that there are five basic dimensions of personality and refer to them as the ‘Big Five’. The five-factor model (FFM) of personality is a theory based on five core categories of human personality – openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. While different theorists may use different terminology, the five factors or personality traits have shown a rather consistent pattern overRead MoreIs The Big 5 Theory The Best Way To Think About Personality? Essay1006 Words   |  5 PagesPersonality is defined as, â€Å"the combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individuals distinctive character.† There are many different theories for what makes up a person’s personality. These theories are classified under 5 general categories. These categories are: biological, behavioural, psychodynamic, humanist, and trait theories. If we look at the trait theories category, two particul ar theories come to mind. These two theories are, â€Å"Big 5 theory† and Eysencks â€Å"Three Traits TheoryRead MoreEssay on Cattells Big Five Factors997 Words   |  4 PagesCattells Big Five Factors Cattell’s Big Five Factors of Personality, Behavioral Genetics, and Evolutionary Personality Theory. Current Research Raymond Cattell (1905-present) designed the â€Å"Big five Factors of Personality†, in which five classifications are revealed. Big Five factors: #1 extraversion vs. introversion, #2 agreeableness vs. antagonism, #3 conscientiousness vs. undirected ness, #4 neuroticism vs. emotional stability, and #5 openness to experience vs. not open to experience

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.